Js. Tsai et al., DOSIMETRIC VERIFICATION OF THE DYNAMIC INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY OF 92 PATIENTS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 40(5), 1998, pp. 1213-1230
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To verify that optimized dose distributions provided by an in
tensity-modulated radiation therapy ((IMRT) system are delivered accur
ately to human patients, Methods and Materials: Anthropomorphic phanto
ms are used to measure IMRT doses, Four types of verification are deve
loped for: I) system commissioning with beams optimized to irradiate s
imulated targets in phantoms, II) plans with patient-optimized beams d
irected to phantoms simulating the patient, Inj patient-phantom hybrid
plans with patient-optimized beams calculated in phantom without furt
her optimization, and IV) in vivo measurements, Phantoms containing do
simeters are irradiated with patient-optimized beams, Films are scanne
d and data were analyzed with software, Percent difference between ver
ified and planned maximum target doses is defined as ''dose discrepanc
y'' (Delta(vp)). The frequency distribution of type II Delta(vp) from
204 verification films of 92 IR-IRT patients is fit to a Gaussian. Mea
surements made in vivo yield discrepancies specified as Delta(ivp), al
so fit to a Gaussian, Results and Discussion: Verification methods rev
ealed three systematic errors in plans that were corrected prior to tr
eatment. Values of \Delta(vp)\ for verification type I are <25%. Type
II verification discrepancies are characterized by a Gaussian fit with
a peak 0.2% from the centroid, and 158 \Delta(vp)\ <5%. The 36 values
of \Delta(vp)\ >5% arise from differences between phantom and patient
geometry, and from simulation, calculation, and other errors. Values
of \Delta(vp)\ for verification III are less than half of the values o
f \Delta(vp)\ for verification II. A Gaussian fit of Delta(ivp) from v
erification TV shows more discrepancy than the fit of Delta(vp), attri
buted to dose gradients in detectors, and exacerbated by immobilizatio
n uncertainty, Conclusions: Dosimetric verification is a critical step
in the quality assurance (QA) of IMRT. Hybrid Verification III is sug
gested as a preliminary quality standard for IMRT. (C) 1998 Elsevier S
cience Inc.