BIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL-FACTORS INFLUENCE GROUP-DIFFERENCES IN PROLACTIN LEVELS AMONG BREAST-FEEDING NEPALI WOMEN

Citation
Jf. Stallings et al., BIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL-FACTORS INFLUENCE GROUP-DIFFERENCES IN PROLACTIN LEVELS AMONG BREAST-FEEDING NEPALI WOMEN, American journal of human biology, 10(2), 1998, pp. 191-210
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Anthropology,"Biology Miscellaneous
ISSN journal
10420533
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
191 - 210
Database
ISI
SICI code
1042-0533(1998)10:2<191:BABIGI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
This study of two natural fertility Nepali groups, the Tamang and Kami , identifies biological and behavioral factors associated with populat ion differences in fertility. Previous research had established that T amang experience longer interbirth intervals than Kami despite similar ly intense nursing practices, and bear considerably higher energy expe nditure due to workload. This cross-sectional study of 71 breastfeedin g women includes prolactin determinations on three blood spot samples collected 5, 30, and 50 minutes following a timed nursing bout, and da ta on maternal age, BMI, menstrual status, previous birth interval, pa rity, infant age, nursing bout length, and durations of supplementatio n and postpartum amenorrhea. The findings show that Tamang breastfeedi ng mothers have higher average prolactin levels than Kami for as long as 22 months postpartum Tamang mothers sustain average prolactin level s above those of nonpregnant, nonlactating women for nearly 2 years po stpartum, whereas prolactin levels among Kami breastfeeding mothers ar e the same as this latter group after 1 year postpartum Furthermore, t he findings indicate that Tamang mothers have higher average prolactin levels regardless of maternal age, physical status (BMI, weight, or h eight), or infant age, and the rate of decline in prolactin from 5 to 50 minutes after suckling is significantly greater for Kami than Taman g. Since factors associated with prolactin levels differ by group, the findings also emphasize that populations vary not only in the strengt h of effects that proximate determinants have on fertility regulation, but also in the pathways by which they exert their effects (direct ph ysiological versus indirect behavioral). (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.