Several workers have concluded that Gabor alignment tasks are performe
d by using central tendencies of the micropatterns as a cue, One reaso
n for this conclusion was that the 3-Gabor alignment task is performed
equally well whether the orientations of the patches are collinear or
orthogonal to the group orientation, We wished to find out if the ori
entation of the micropatterns has any effect on performance, We tested
subjects in 3-micropattern alignment tasks using a variety of orienta
tional conditions, If three vertically-aligned Gabor patches were vert
ical, horizontal or both, or if bullseye or Gaussian blobs were used,
no difference in performance was found, If, however, the orientation o
f the patches was randomized, performance became much worse, Similarly
, if the three patches were at 45 deg, thresholds were raised, The eff
ect of orientation was maintained across different spatial frequencies
, Control conditions involving randomization of the phase of the sinus
oidal carrier, or jitter on the size of Gaussian blobs, confirmed that
a central tendency of the micropatterns was indeed being used by subj
ects, indicating that the role of orientation in this task is that of
a mask, rather than of a cue. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All right
s reserved.