Dt. Azar et al., PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY FOR RESIDUAL MYOPIA AFTER RADIAL KERATOTOMY, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 24(3), 1998, pp. 303-311
Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcomes in patients having photorefra
ctive keratectomy (PRK) to correct residual myopia after radial kerato
tomy (RK). Setting: Nine refractive surgery centers in the United Stal
es and one in South Korea. Methods: This retrospective analysis compri
sed 38 eyes of 32 patients treated with PRK after RK and followed for
12 months. Analysis was based on pre-RK and pre-PRK refraction as well
as response to RK (pre-RK minus pre-PRK refractions). Results: Mean p
re-RK and pre-PRK refractions were -8.11 diopters (D) +/- 2.92 (SD) an
d -4.28 +/- 2.08 D, respectively. One month after PRK, mean refraction
was +0.42 +/- 1.56 D and regressed to -0.95 +/- 1.24 D at 12 months.
At 12 months, 65% of eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or
worse, and 11.1% lost 2 or more lines of best corrected acuity. Of ey
es with an original error of -6.00 or less, 81.8% were within +/-1.00
D of intended correction at 12 months and of those with an original er
ror of -9.12 to -20.00 D, 50.0% (P = .004). All eyes with residual (pr
e-PRK) errors of -3.00 D or less and 42.9% with a residual error of -6
.12 to -9.00 D were within +/-1.00 D of intended correction (P = .07).
There were no statistically significant differences in the response t
o PRK between eyes that had an RK response of 0 to 3.00, 3.12 to 6.00,
or 6.12 to 12.00 D. Conclusion: Patients with lower original and resi
dual myopia achieved better visual outcomes after PRK than those with
higher myopia. The amount of myopic correction achieved using RK was n
ot predictive of the amount of myopic correction using PRK.