Ll. Price et al., INFLUENCE OF CONTINUOUS LIGHT AND L-D CYCLES ON THE GROWTH AND CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE INCLUDING COCCOLITHOPHORES, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 223(2), 1998, pp. 223-234
Eleven species of marine phytoplankton belonging to the Prymnesiophyce
ae, nine of which were coccolithophores, were tested for their growth,
physiological, and morphological responses to continuous light and a
L:D cycle. Isochrysis galbana (Parke) and Chsysochromulina sp. and the
non-coccolith-forming strain of Coccolithus pelagicus (Gaarder et Mar
kali) grew poorly or not at all under continuous light. The response o
f the nine coccolithophores to continuous light vs. L,D cycle was more
variable. Two coccolith-forming species Coccolithus pelagicus COPEL a
nd Coccolithus neohelis (McIntyre and BC) grew faster under the 14L:10
D cycle, while two other coccolith-forming species, Emiliania huxleyi
(Lohmann) Hay et Mohler 88E and Cyclococcolithus leptoporus (Murray et
Blackman) Kamptner, grew faster under continuous light. The growth ra
tes of the other five coccolithophorids (two coccolith-forming and thr
ee non-coccolith-forming species) showed no difference between continu
ous light and L:D cultures, No significant differences in chlorophyll
a (chi a), POC, PON, or C:N ratios were observed for species grown und
er the two light regimes. The coccolith-forming coccolithophores conta
ined 3-5 times more chi a than the non-coccolith-forming coccolithopho
res. These results suggest that the coccosphere reflects light and sha
des the cell, and thus the cell compensates by producing more chi a, N
o differences in cell and coccolith dimensions or morphology were obse
rved under either light regime. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.