INTRAVENOUS-INFUSION OF TOTAL-DOSE IRON IS SUPERIOR TO ORAL IRON IN TREATMENT OF ANEMIA IN PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS - A SINGLE-CENTER COMPARATIVE-STUDY
N. Ahsan, INTRAVENOUS-INFUSION OF TOTAL-DOSE IRON IS SUPERIOR TO ORAL IRON IN TREATMENT OF ANEMIA IN PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS - A SINGLE-CENTER COMPARATIVE-STUDY, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 9(4), 1998, pp. 664-668
In the treatment of anemia of chronic renal failure, the most common c
ause of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) resistance is iron de
ficiency. In peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, oral iron therapy is a
n accepted and convenient method of iron supplementation. The effectiv
eness of oral iron, however, is limited by many factors, including gas
trointestinal side effects and poor gastric absorption. This study pro
spectively compared the efficacy of single intravenous infusion of tot
al dose iron (ITDI group) given in an outpatient setting with oral iro
n (oral group) for the treatment of anemia in PD patients. Twenty-five
adult stable PD patients with baseline hematocrit 25 to 35% were ente
red into the study. Thirteen patients with serum transferrin saturatio
n (TSAT) <25% received ITDI, and 12 patients with TSAT between 25 and
35% received oral iron. One patient in the oral group received emergen
t blood transfusion and was excluded from analysis. Hematocrit and iro
n indices were measured at monthly intervals. Doses of rhEPO were adju
sted monthly to maintain target hematocrit at 35%. At the end of the s
tudy (6 mo), despite similar baseline mean hematocrit (31.0 +/- 0.9 ve
rsus 33.0 +/- 1.0%), comparable mean baseline weekly rhEPO dose (7886
+/- 1449 versus 6370 +/- 1553 U/wk), and significantly lower level of
mean TSAT (11.3 +/- 3.5 versus 30.1 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.05), the ITDI grou
p when compared with the oral group had significantly higher mean hema
tocrit (36.0 +/- 1.0 versus 31.4 +/- 1.1%; P < 0.05) and TSAT (33.7 +/
- 3.7 versus 22.6 +/- 4.0%; P < 0.05) values. In addition, the final m
ean dose of weekly rhEPO was significantly lower in the ITDI group (47
99 +/- 981 versus 9998 +/- 1027 U/wk; P < 0.05). No patient in the ITD
I group developed an adverse reaction to intravenous iron. It is concl
uded that ITDI represents a more efficacious method of iron supplement
ation in PD patients receiving rhEPO. Moreover, ITDI is safe and well
tolerated and can be administered in an outpatient setting.