R. Sesso et al., A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS FROM LIVING UNRELATED DONORS, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 9(4), 1998, pp. 684-691
Due to the shortage of cadaveric organs, kidneys from living unrelated
donors (LUD) are increasingly being used for transplantation. The lon
g-term outcome for LUD recipients is not completely known. This study
was undertaken to evaluate the long-term graft survival in LUD recipie
nts and compare it with that of cadaver donor allograft recipients. Th
ree hundred and sixty-four LUD and 3881 cadaveric kidney recipients we
re evaluated using data obtained through the Brazilian Renal Transplan
t Registry. Transplants performed between January 1, 1987, and June 30
, 1996, were eligible for analysis, Graft and patient survival were es
timated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Sixty percent of the LUD were from
spouses. The median duration of follow-up was 23.8 mo (0 to 117.2 mo)
. Patient survival rates were not significantly different for LUD and
cadaveric kidney recipients (69% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.9 t
o 76.1%] versus 73.2% [71 to 75.4%] at 5 yr; 69% [61.9 to 76.1%] versu
s 60.6% [55.1 to 66.1%] at 9.6 yr). Graft survival rates for recipient
s of LUD allografts were similar to those for cadaveric kidneys at 5 y
r (50.1% [43.2 to 57%] versus 50.4% [48.1 to 52.8%]) and higher, altho
ugh not significantly, at 9.6 yr (45.7% [37.7 to 53.7%] versus 32.7% [
26.4 to 39%], respectively, P = 0.14). In a multivariate analysis usin
g the Cox proportional hazards regression model, after adjusting for r
ecipient age, race, history of previous transplantation, and year of t
ransplantation, the risk of graft failure was 16% (95% CI, -3% to 31%)
lower for LUD than cadaveric recipients. We conclude that LUD are an
excellent alternative to cadaveric kidney donors. The long-term patien
t and graft survival rates for recipients of LUD allografts are at lea
st as good as those for recipients of cadaveric kidneys.