M. Delima et al., COMPARISON OF REFERRING AND TERTIARY CANCER CENTER PHYSICIANS DIAGNOSES IN PATIENTS WITH LEUKEMIA, The American journal of medicine, 104(3), 1998, pp. 246-251
PURPOSE: To analyze the rates of concordance in the diagnosis of vario
us hematological malignancies among patients referred to a tertiary ca
ncer center, comparing the referring diagnosis with the final diagnosi
s at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a
cross-sectional study analyzing the 409 patients referred to the M.D.
Anderson Leukemia Service in 1995 in whom a bone marrow examination w
as performed by the referring physician and in whom this examination w
as repeated al our institution. We also analyzed 100 cases, including
84 of the 409 referred patients for whom the diagnostic outside bone m
arrow slide had been sent for review. RESULTS: The overall concordance
rate was 73%. In 18% discordances were present and considered of majo
r importance (affecting treatment and/or prognosis) while in 9% there
were minor discordances. Major discordance rates were 2% for chronic l
ymphocytic leukemic leukemia and 5% for chronic myelogenous leukemia,
but 29% for acute myelogenous leukemia (79 patients), 43% for acute pr
omyelocytic leukemia (7 patients), 19% for acute lymphocytic leukemia
(42 patients), 57% for hairy cell leukemia (7 patients), and 23% for t
he myelodysplastic syndromes (75 patients). The concordance rate was 7
6% in the 100 cases in which bone marrow specimens permitted compariso
n of the morphologic diagnosis made by M.D. Anderson and the referring
physician using the same slide, with a rate of 75% in the acute leuke
mias as finally diagnosed at our institution. CONCLUSION: Although in
the majority of cases the referring physicians and the specialty servi
ce agreed on diagnosis, major discordance occurs in a significant numb
er of cases, including highly treatable diseases such as acute promyel
ocystic leukemia and hairy cell leukemia.