Ks. Zahir et al., COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING AND SURGICAL DELAY ON PEDICLED MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP SURVIVAL IN A RAT MODEL, Annals of plastic surgery, 40(4), 1998, pp. 422-428
Both surgical delay (SD) and ischemic preconditioning (IP) have been s
hown to he effective in improving the survival of pedicled musculocuta
neous flaps, The goal of our study was to determine the effects of IP
and SD, separately and together, on the survival of pedicled transvers
e rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps in a rat model, Thirt
y-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups of 8 rats
each: (1) control, (2) 2-week SD, (3) IP, and (4) SD plus IF. A TRAM
flap was elevated in each rat. Flap viability was assessed on the fift
h postoperative day by computerized video planimetry, Mean area of fla
p survival was compared between the control, IP, SD, and SD plus IP gr
oups using analysis of variance and Student's t-test. improvement in s
urface area survival was seen in musculocutaneous flaps subjected to I
F, SD, and SD plus IP compared with the control, IP and SD improved su
rvival 1.3 and 1.4 times the control area respectively. Differences be
tween treatment and control flaps were statistically significant (p <
0.04), In addition, the combination of SD plus IP improved survival by
1.8 times, which is statistically different tram controls and from ei
ther technique individually (p < 0.002). IP and SD have similar effica
cy in improving survival in this musculocutaneous flap model. The effe
cts of IP and SD appear to be additive, The advantage of IP over SD is
that. IP can be performed during the same operative session as the fl
ap elevation and only adds 1 hour to the surgical procedure.