Purpose: To observe the resin/enamel interface produced by different a
dhesive systems. Materials and Methods: A conventional three-step smea
r layer removing adhesive system (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose), a two-ste
p smear layer removing adhesive system (Prime & Bond), and a two-step
smear layer dissolving adhesive system containing a self-etching prime
r (Panavia 21) were evaluated. Flat enamel surfaces were obtained from
approximal surfaces of 18 extracted human molars. A total of 36 surfa
ces were collected and divided into three groups of 12 samples. One-ha
lf of each specimen in each group was etched with 35% phosphoric acid
prior to the application of each adhesive system, with the second half
being kept unetched. Subsequently, resin composite was placed and pol
ymerized for 40 seconds. The samples were fractured and immersed into
HCl and NaOCl solutions, followed by critical point drying and sputter
coating for examination with a field emission scanning electron micro
scope. Results: In the etched samples, Panavia 21 and Scotchbond Multi
-Purpose showed more consistent resin tag penetration than did Prime &
Bond. Unetched Prime & Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose samples show
ed minimal or no adhesive penetration in enamel surfaces.