AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN TEMPERATE AREAS - A REVIEW

Citation
Dw. Bussink et O. Oenema, AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN TEMPERATE AREAS - A REVIEW, Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 51(1), 1998, pp. 19-33
Citations number
127
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
13851314
Volume
51
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
19 - 33
Database
ISI
SICI code
1385-1314(1998)51:1<19:AVFDFS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Ammonia (NH3) emissions from dairy farm systems cause environmental pr oblems. This paper reviews and quantifies the major loss routes of NH3 in dairy farms. Furthermore, management options are discussed that re duce NH3 losses. Losses of NH3 occur during slurry application, housin g, slurry storage, grazing, fertilizer application and from crops, in descending order of importance. Animal waste is the major source in fo ur of the six cases. This ranking varies between farms and between cou ntries, depending on environmental conditions and management practices . Total NH3 losses range from 17 to 46 kg N cow yr(-1), reflecting the variability in amount and composition of animal excreta (urine + faec es), management of the slurry and soil and environmental conditions. T he amount and composition of urine and faeces depend on N tranformatio ns in the digestive track of the cow. Of the major nitrogen compounds excreted urea has the highest potential for NH3 volatilization followe d by allantoin, uric acid and creatinine in decreasing order. Creatine , xanthine and hypoxanthine have a low NH3 volatilization potential. R educing the excretion of urea and urea like products by optimizing N I ntake (NI) and N Retention (NR) is one way of decreasing NH3 losses. I mprovement is possible since NR is about 20% of NI in practice, wherea s 43% is theoretically possible. The second solution is to reduce the rate of NH3 loss by technical means like direct incorporation of slurr y into the soil, dilution or acidification of slurry, covering of the slurry storage and/or acidification or dilution of slurry in the stora ge. These techniques have been known for a long time and now become av ailable on a large scale in practice. Reducing the surface area per co w in the shed and sprinkling floors with water to remove and to dilute urine also decreases NH3 loss. Reducing NH3 loss requires a whole far m system approach, because it shows how intervening in one part may af fect NH3 losses in other parts of the system. Reducing NH3 loss may in crease nitrate leaching and denitrification. To prevent this, the achi eved reduction in NH3 loss should lead to a reduction of total N input of fertilizers, concentrates and forage on the N budget of the farm, which is possible as a reduction of NH3 loss improves the N fertilizin g value of slurry. Model calculations showed great scope for reducing NH3 losses on dairy farms by improved management. Up to three fold red uctions in NH3 loss are possible together with marked reductions in mi neral fertilizer usage. The rate at which improved management techniqu es, will be introduced in practice depends on legislation, the applica bility of new techniques and the expected increase in net production c osts. To comply with environmental targets requires a huge effort of f armers with associated high costs.