Jwg. Yarnell et al., IS METABOLIC SYNDROME A DISCRETE ENTITY IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION - EVIDENCE FROM THE CAERPHILLY AND SPEEDWELL POPULATION STUDIES, HEART, 79(3), 1998, pp. 248-252
Objective-To examine the clinical and epidemiological utility of the c
oncepts of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance syndrome in two p
rospective cohort studies of white men. Methods-Men aged 45-63 years w
ere screened for evidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) between 197
9 and 1982 and followed up at regular intervals thereafter. Non-fatal
coronary events were validated from hospital records and fatal coronar
y events from death certificates. Results-Analysis of serum insulin co
ncentrations in non-diabetic individuals measured at entry to the stud
y showed no independent contribution to the prediction of subsequent I
HD at 10 year follow up. Blood glucose concentrations, however, showed
a small independent contribution in the combined cohort in the upper
fifth of the distribution. Three different models of metabolic syndrom
e among non-diabetic individuals were defined based on tertiles, media
ns, and clusters. The predictive value of each model was assessed usin
g logistic regression before and after adjustment for conventional and
metabolic risk factors. After adjustment the odds were non-significan
t and close to unity. Conclusions-This study did not detect any comple
x relation among the five variables defining metabolic syndrome; the e
xcess risk seems to be no greater than can be explained by individual
effects of the defining variables in a multiple logistic model.