Fj. Overdyk et al., SUCCESSFUL STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING OPERATING-ROOM EFFICIENCY AT ACADEMIC-INSTITUTIONS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 86(4), 1998, pp. 896-906
In this prospective study, we evaluated the etiology of operating room
(OR) delays in an academic institution, examined the impact of multid
isciplinary strategies to improve OR efficiency, and established OR ti
ming benchmarks for use in future OR efficiency studies. OR times and
delay etiologies were collected for 94 cases during the initial phase
of the study. Timing data and delay etiologies were analyzed, and 2 wk
of multidisciplinary OR efficiency awareness education was conducted
for the nursing, surgical, and anesthesia staff. After the education p
eriod, timing data were collected from 1787 cases, and monthly reports
Listing individual case delays and timing data were sent to the Chief
s of Service. For the first case of the day, patient in room, anesthes
ia ready, surgical preparation start, and procedure start time were si
gnificantly earlier (P < 0.01) in the posteducation period compared wi
th the preeducation period, and the procedure start time for the first
case of the day occurred, on average, 22 min earlier than all other p
rocedures. For all cases combined, turnover time decreased, on average
, by 16 min. Unavailability of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and reside
nts decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as causes of OR delays. Anesthe
sia induction times were consistently longer for the vascular and card
iothoracic services, whereas surgical preparation time was increased f
or the neurosurgical and orthopedic services (P < 0.05). identificatio
n of the etiology of OR inefficiency, combined with multidisciplinary
awareness training and personal accountability, can improve OR efficie
ncy. The time savings realized are probably most cost-effective when c
ombined with more flexible OR staffing and improved OR scheduling. Imp
lications: We achieved significant improvements in operating room effi
ciency by analyzing operating room data on causes of delays, devising
strategies for minimizing the most common delays, and subsequently mea
suring delay data. Personal accountability, streamlining of procedures
, interdisciplinary team work, and accurate data collection were all i
mportant contributors to improved efficiency.