Dt. Uehling et al., VAGINAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION FOR RECURRENT URINARY-TRACT INFECTION - PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIAL, The Journal of urology, 157(6), 1997, pp. 2049-2052
Purpose: Decreased local immunity to uropathogenic bacteria may be a f
actor predisposing women to recurrent urinary tract infections. Our ph
ase I study demonstrated the safety of a multi-strain vaccine administ
ered as a vaginal suppository. A phase II study was conducted to deter
mine vaccine efficacy. Materials and Methods: A total of 91 women susc
eptible to recurrent urinary tract infections was entered into the stu
dy and the courses were analyzed in a randomized, double-blind, placeb
o controlled trial of vaginal mucosal immunization. Subjects received
3 vaginal suppositories at weekly intervals. Depending on the treatmen
t group each suppository contained 1 of 2 vaccine doses or suppository
material only. Each patient was followed for 5 months to record infec
tion episodes, and obtain urine, vaginal irrigates and serum to measur
e immunological responses. Results: Immunogen treated women who were o
ff antibiotic prophylaxis throughout the study had a significant delay
in interval to reinfection during the first 8 weeks compared to women
receiving placebo. Mean interval until reinfection was delayed from 8
.7 weeks for placebo treated to 13 weeks for vaccine treated women. Im
munological responses in serum, urine and vaginal fluid were variable.
No serious adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: These data dem
onstrate that vaginal mucosal immunization can enhance resistance to u
rinary tract infections in susceptible patients.