Le. Ginsberg et al., THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LACK OF MR CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF SUPRATENTORIALBRAIN-TUMORS IN ADULTS - HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF A SERIES, Surgical neurology, 49(4), 1998, pp. 436-440
BACKGROUND To correlate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of n
on-enhancement of supratentorial brain neoplasms in adults with histop
athologic findings. METHODS Forty adult patients whose preoperative MR
I studies demonstrated a non-enhancing supratentorial brain neoplasm w
ere identified retrospectively. Biopsy material for all patients was t
hen reviewed by a board-certified neuropathologist, RESULTS Histopatho
logic examination identified 24 (60%) low-grade gliomas: 4 (10%) low-g
rade astrocytomas, 10 (25%) low-grade gliomas (not further classified)
, 8 (20%) low-grade oligodendrogliomas, and 2 (5%) law-grade mixed oli
goastrocytomas. However, 16 (40%) nonenhancing lesions were classified
as anaplastic gliomas: 12 (30%) anaplastic astrocytomas, 1 (2.5%) ana
plastic mixed oligoastrocytoma, 1 (2.5%) anaplastic oligodendroglioma,
and 2 (5%) anaplastic infiltrating gliomas of indeterminate subtype.
CONCLUSION Non-enhancement of supratentorial brain neoplasms in adults
does not equate with low-grade malignancy, This fact should be taken
into account when biopsy and treatment are being planned in patients w
ith nonenhancing brain tumors. More aggressive and/or surgical therapy
might be indicated for such lesions, particularly those in the nondom
inant hemisphere or nonmotor areas. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.