K. Labuhn et al., NURSES AND PHARMACISTS EXPOSURE TO ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUGS - FINDINGS FROM INDUSTRIAL-HYGIENE SCANS AND URINE MUTAGENICITY TESTS, Cancer nursing, 21(2), 1998, pp. 79-89
Data from 83 nurses and pharmacists handling antineoplastic drugs and
35 nurse/pharmacist controls who participated in a national study of a
ntineoplastic drug-handling risks were examined to investigate antineo
plastic drug exposure. Measures of external exposure included self-com
pletion drug logs and industrial hygiene scans conducted in clinical s
ettings. Internal exposure was measured by urine mutagenicity tests on
end-of-week 24-hour urine specimens. To control for potential confoun
ders, the staff was asked to complete food and hobby diaries and to av
oid identified mutagenic substances for 1 week before collection of 24
-hour urine samples. On the scans of the drug handlers, 13% showed one
or more spots of drug contamination on gloved and ungloved hands, gow
ns, or shoes. Of the 24-hour urine samples, 15% were mutagenic for Sal
monella typhimurium: Rates did not differ significantly for drug handl
ers and controls. Among nurses who both prepared and administered anti
neoplastics, those with positive mutagenicity tests handled more doses
of the drugs, used less skin protection, and had more skin contact wi
th the drugs than those with negative tests. Nurses who only administe
red the drugs and had positive mutagenicity tests handled fewer doses
of drugs than those with negative tests, but they also reported less u
se of protection and more skin contact. For both groups of nurses, ski
n contact with antineoplastics was associated with positive mutagenici
ty test results (p < 0.01).