In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was qu
ickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the pu
blic health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data
from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear
regression models (controlling for abstinence time, age, percent prov
en fertility, specimen collection method, study goal and location) wer
e used to examine regional differences and the interaction between reg
ion (United States, Europe, and non-Western countries) and year. Nonli
near models and residual confounding were also examined in these data.
Using a linear model (adjusted R-2 = 0.80), means and slopes differed
significantly across regions (p = 0.02). Mean sperm densities were hi
ghest in Europe and lowest in non-Western countries. A decline in sper
m density was seen in the United States (studies from 1938-1988; slope
= (-)1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), (-)1.90-(-)1.10) and Europe
(1971-1990; slope = (-)3.13; CI, (-)4.96-(-)1.30), but not in non-West
ern countries (1978-1989; slope = 1.56; CI, (-)1.00-(-)4.12). Results
from nonlinear models (quadratic and spline) were similar. Thus, furth
er analysis of these studies supports a significant decline in sperm d
ensity in the United States and Europe. Confounding and selection bias
are unlikely to account for these results. However, some intraregiona
l differences were as large as mean decline in sperm density between 1
938 and 1990, and recent reports from Europe and the United States fur
ther support large interarea differences in sperm density. Identifying
the cause(s) of these regional and temporal differences, whether envi
ronmental or other, is dearly warranted.