Jm. Adams et Wh. Jones, THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF MARITAL COMMITMENT - AN INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS, Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1177-1196
Although theoretical statements regarding the conceptualization of mar
ital commitment abound in the literature, no research has attempted to
compare these conceptualizations empirically. Six studies involving 1
,787 participants explored the conceptual structure of marital commitm
ent through a variety of empirical methods. Results suggested the exis
tence of 3 primary dimensions of marital commitment: an attraction com
ponent based on devotion, satisfaction, and love, a moral-normative co
mponent based on a sense of personal responsibility for maintaining th
e marriage and on the belief that marriage is an important social and
religious institution, and a constraining component based on fear of t
he social, financial, and emotional costs of relationship termination.
These factors most strongly resemble the three dimensions proposed by
M. P. Johnson (1991) but also appear to represent the general feature
s of interpersonal commitment described in most theoretical treatments
of the construct and correspond well with couples' personal accounts
of what it feels like to be in a committed relationship.