Statement of problem. It is possible to incorrectly seat an abutment o
n an external hex implant. Purpose, This study investigated the theore
tical and practical limits of radiographic verification of tile comple
te: stating of implant abutments on external hex implants. Material an
d methods, A positioning device that could accurately place the film a
nd/or tube head in any vertical relation desired relative to the impla
nt and abutment was fabricated. For all records, a standard abutment w
as secured to the implant in both a fully seated position (closed) and
with the abutment turned approximately 30 degrees and seated atop the
implant external hex (open). Digital radiographs were made with the t
ube head fixed perpendicular to the implant and the film angled at 0,
5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 degrees. The film was then posit
ioned parallel to the implant and the tube head was angled at 0, 5, 10
, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 degrees. An image of each position wa
s shown to 36 dentists and they were asked if the image was diagnostic
for determining the status of the implant/abutment interface. Results
, The data were analyzed with a computer statistics program. The group
with the tube head changed was analyzed with the Cochran's Q test and
revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) change in the diagn
ostic value of radiographs beginning at 20 degrees. The group with the
film angle changed was analyzed with a Pearson chi-square and showed
no statistical difference (p = 0.394) for the diagnostic value of any
of the film angles. Conclusion. Maintaining the tube head to less than
20 degrees from perpendicular to the long axis of the implant resulte
d in a diagnostic radiograph, regardless of the angle of the film.