The Yanomami of Venezuela and Brazil have become an arena of conflict
and aggression in the Amazon in at least three respects: their interna
l aggression; the aggression among anthropologists and others concerne
d with them; and the external aggression against the Yanomami from Wes
tern society. As such, the Yanomami provide a microcosm of several asp
ects of the anthropology of conflict and aggression. After some backgr
ound, a critical analysis is developed of 10 problem areas that call i
nto serious question the scientific status of Yanomami as one of the m
ost violent human societies ever known in anthropology: the Yanomami a
s ''the fierce people''; documentation of their aggression; inflation
of their aggression as warfare; neglect of cross-cultural perspective;
modern warfare as reversion to tribalization; the negative concept of
peace; male sexist bias; the Yanomami as ''primitive''; the character
of debates; and research priorities and professional ethics. The anal
ysis has more general implications for the epistemology of the study o
f aggression. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.