Aim: To compare the significance of the two-dimensional and three-dime
nsional sonography in the diagnostis of meniscal tears under clinical
conditions. Methods: Sixty menisci of knees with clinical symptoms (44
medial and 16 lateral menisci) were examined by an identical transduc
er in a two-and three-dimensional sonography technique. The findings w
ere compared with the diagnosis made with subsequent arthroscopy. Resu
lts: In the diagnosis of meniscal lesions the two-and three-dimensiona
l sonography reached a sensitivity of 92% and 100% and a specificity o
f 83% and 88%, respectively. The positive predictive value of these me
thods was 58% and 67%. The negative predictive value was 98% and 100%.
Because of the good results with the two-dimensional sonography, ther
e were no statistically significant differences between both methods.
The three-dimensional sonography, however, proved to be superior, to t
he two-dimensional sonography in the analysis of subgroups (medial and
lateral menisci, menisci with and without clinical symptoms). The neg
ative predictive value of the three-dimensional sonography was 100% fo
r all of these subgroups. Conclusion: Although this study shows no sig
nificant difference in the results of two-and three-dimensional sonogr
aphy, the analysis of subgroups displays a slightly improved significa
nce for diagnosis of meniscal tears by three-dimensional sonography. T
he high negative predictive value shows that three-dimensional sonogra
phy, performed by an experienced examiner, may be useful to exclude me
niscal tears. This result may help focus further cost-intensive or inv
asive examinations.