MIXED EFFECTS LOGISTIC-REGRESSION MODELS FOR LONGITUDINAL BINARY RESPONSE DATA WITH INFORMATIVE DROP-OUT

Citation
Tr. Tenhave et al., MIXED EFFECTS LOGISTIC-REGRESSION MODELS FOR LONGITUDINAL BINARY RESPONSE DATA WITH INFORMATIVE DROP-OUT, Biometrics, 54(1), 1998, pp. 367-383
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Statistic & Probability","Biology Miscellaneous","Statistic & Probability",Mathematics
Journal title
ISSN journal
0006341X
Volume
54
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
367 - 383
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-341X(1998)54:1<367:MELMFL>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
A shared parameter model with logistic link is presented for longitudi nal binary response data to accommodate informative drop-out. The mode l consists of observed longitudinal and missing response components th at share random effects parameters. To our knowledge, this is the firs t presentation of such a model for longitudinal binary response data. Comparisons are made to an approximate conditional legit model in term s of a clinical trial dataset and simulations. The naive mixed effects legit model that does not account for informative drop-out is also co mpared. The simulation-based differences among the models with respect to coverage of confidence intervals, bias, and mean squared error (MS E) depend on at least two factors: whether an effect is a between- or within-subject effect and the amount of between-subject variation as e xhibited by variance components of the random effects distributions. W hen the shared parameter model holds, the approximate conditional mode l provides confidence intervals with good coverage for within-cluster factors but not for between-cluster factors. The converse is true for the naive model. Under a different drop-out mechanism, when the probab ility of drop-out is dependent only on the current unobserved observat ion, all three models behave similarly by providing between-subject co nfidence intervals with good coverage and comparable MSE and bias but poor within-subject confidence intervals, MSE, and bias. The naive mod el does more poorly with respect to the within-subject effects than do the shared parameter and approximate conditional models. The data ana lysis, which entails a comparison of two pain relievers and a placebo with respect to pain relief, conforms to the simulation results based on the shared parameter model but not on the simulation based on the o utcome-driven drop-out process. This comparison between the data analy sis and simulation results may provide evidence that the shared parame ter model holds for the pain data.