L. Lind et al., METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE EVALUATION OF ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT VASODILATATION IN THE HUMAN FOREARM, Clinical physiology, 18(2), 1998, pp. 81-87
The present study, involving 56 healthy subjects from a health screeni
ng, was undertaken to address some methodological questions regarding
the measurement of endothelial function using local intra-arterial inf
usions of metacholine (2 and 5 mu g min(-1)) to evaluate endothelium-d
ependent vasodilatation, and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 5 and 10 mu g
min(-1)) to evaluate endothelium-independent vasodilatation. Forearm b
lood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. The
ratio of FBF during the highest dose of metacholine to FBF during the
highest dose of SNP was used as an index of endothelial function. In 1
0 young volunteers the procedure was repeated after 2 h and again afte
r 3 weeks in order to study short-term and long-term reproducibility o
f the method. Neither the vasodilatatory response to metacholine (r =
0.006) nor that to SNP (r = 0.08) was related to resting FBF. Neither
the circumference nor :che length of the arm was related to endothelia
l function (r = 0.01-0.11), as evaluated by the FBF on metacholine to
nitroprusside ratio (mean 1.3 +/- 0.3 SD). The use of a wrist cuff to
exclude hand circulation, or not, did not influence the evaluation of
endothelial function significantly. Maximal FBF after 3 min of arteria
l occlusion of the forearm was significantly related to blood flow dur
ing both metacholine (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) and nitroprusside Infusion (
r = 0.36, P<0.05), but not to the FBF on metacholine to nitroprusside
ratio (r = 0.01). The short-term and long-term reproducibility of FBF
during vasodilatation with metacholine and SNP was good (r = 0.89-0.97
, P<0.001), while the individual measurements for resting FBF were les
s reproducible when repeated after 3 weeks (r = 0.34). In conclusion,
endothelial function was not related to resting FBF, nor to the arm ci
rcumference or length, No major difference was seen whether endothelia
l function was evaluated with or without exclusion of the hand circula
tion. Maximal FBF during reactive hyperaemia was not related to endoth
elial function.