Rl. Schilsky et al., PHASE-I CLINICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDY OF ENILURACIL PLUS FLUOROURACIL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(4), 1998, pp. 1450-1457
Purpose: To determine the highest dose of fluorouracil(S-FU) that coul
d be safely administered with Eniluracil (776C85; Glare Wellcome Inc,
Research Triangle Park, NC), an inactivator af dihydropyrimidine dehyd
rogenase (DPD), on a daily schedule for 5 days, and to define the toxi
cities of the combination and the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU when admini
stered with 776C85. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid
tumors refractory to standard therapy were enrolled at two institutio
ns. The study consisted of three periods designed to evaluate the safe
ty, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 776C85 alone (period 1);
the effects of 776C85 on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU (period 2); and
the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU, with or without leucovorin,
that could be safely administered with 776C85 (period 3). Cohorts of
a, least three patients each received oral 776C85 alone at doses of 3.
7 mg/m(2)/d, 18.5 mg/m(2)/d and 0.74 mg/m(2)/d. After a 14-day washout
period, each patient then received 776C85 daily for 3 days, with a si
ngle intravenous (IV) bolus dose of 5-FU 10 mg/m(2) on day 2. After a
second washout period, patients were treated with 776C85 daily for 7 d
ays and 5-FU IV bolus on days 2 through 6. The starting dose of 5-FU 1
0 mg/m(2)/d was escalated until the MTD was determined. After determin
ation of the MTD of 5-FU given with 776C85, oral leucovorin 50 mg/d on
days 2 through 6 was added to determine the MTD of 5-FU with leucovor
in in the presence of 776C85. Near the completion of the study, additi
onal cohorts of patients were treated with 776C85 at 50 mg/d and oral
5-FU with or without leucovorin. Results: Sixty-five patients were enr
olled onto the study and 60 were assessable for toxicity and response.
Bone marrow suppression was the primary and dose-limiting toxicity of
this regimen. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, anemia,
anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. 776C85 suppressed DPD activit
y in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by at least 90% for at
least 24 hours at all dose levels tested. In the presence of 776C85,
5-FU half-life was prolonged, clearance was reduced, and the drug disp
layed linear pharmacokinetics. Recommended doses for further testing o
n a daily for 5-day schedule are 776C85 10 mg/d with IV 5-FU 25 mg/m(2
)/d; 776C85 10 mg/d with IV 5-FU 20 mg/m(2)/d plus leucovorin 50 mg/d;
776C85 50 mg/d with 5-FU given orally at 15 mg/m(2)/d with leucovorin
at 50 mg/d. Conclusion: 5-FU can be safely administered with 776C85;
however, the MTDs are considerably lower than those conventionally use
d, caused, at least in part, by marked alterations in 5-FU plasma phar
macokinetics. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.