R. Payne et al., QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND CANCER PAIN - SATISFACTION AND SIDE-EFFECTS WITH TRANSDERMAL FENTANYL VERSUS ORAL MORPHINE, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(4), 1998, pp. 1588-1593
Purpose: To compare pain-related treatment satisfaction, patient-perce
ived side effects, functioning, and well-being in patients with advanc
ed cancer who were receiving either transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic, J
anssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ) or sustained-release oral form
s of morphine (MS Contin, Perdue Frederick Co, Norwalk, CT, or Oramorp
h SR, Roxanne Laboratories, Columbus, OH). Patients and Methods: A tot
al of 504 assessable cancer patients participated in this cross-sectio
nal, quality-of-life study. Relevant elements of four validated scales
were used-the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G
) scale, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Medical Outcomes Study (M
OS) questionnaire, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS)-as
well as original scales that were developed and validated for this st
udy. Results: The majority of patients in both treatment groups had la
te-stage (IV/D) cancer. Patients who received transdermal fentanyl wer
e more satisfied overall with their pain medication than those who rec
eived sustained-release oral forms of morphine (P = .035). Fentanyl pa
tients also experienced a significantly lower frequency (P < .002) and
impact (P < .001) of pain medication side effects, These results occu
rred despite the fact that cancer patients who received fentanyl were
significantly older (P < .001) and had significantly lower functioning
and well-being scores (P = .001). Measures of pain intensity, sleep a
dequacy, and symptoms demonstrated no significant differences between
treatment groups. Conclusion: These data suggest that patients are mor
e satisfied with transdermal fentanyl compared with sustained-release
oral forms of morphine, A lower frequency and reduced impact of side e
ffects with transdermal fentanyl may be one reason cancer patients who
receive fentanyl are more satisfied with their pain management. (C) 1
998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.