Me. Vanamburgh et al., EFFECTS OF 3 PREPUBERTAL BODY GROWTH-RATES ON PERFORMANCE OF HOLSTEINHEIFERS DURING FIRST LACTATION, Journal of dairy science, 81(2), 1998, pp. 527-538
The effects of body weight (BW) gain, different sources of protein dur
ing the prepubertal period (90 to 320 kg of BW), and the performance o
f Holstein heifers during their first lactation were studied. Heifers
(n = 273) were assigned to one of three dietary energy treatments that
were designed to achieve average daily gains of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 kg/
d. Within each energy treatment, different protein sources (plant prot
ein and urea or both plant and animal proteins) were imposed. Actual a
verage daily gains by heifers on each energy treatment were 0.68, 0.83
, and 0.94 kg/d for heifers that were fed diets formulated for average
daily gains of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 kg/d, respectively, which allowed th
e following ages at first calving: 24.5, 22.0, and 21.3 mo. Breeding w
as initiated when heifers weighed approximately 340 kg. Protein source
s did not affect average daily gain or milk yield. Analysis of the pre
planned comparisons of actual 305-d and 4% fat-corrected milk yields i
ndicated that yield was significantly reduced for heifers grown at 0.9
4 kg/d (9387 and 8558 kg, respectively) compared with that of heifers
grown at 0.68 kg/d (9873 and 9008 kg, respectively). However, further
regression analysis of fat-corrected milk and residual milk from a tes
t day model on prepubertal BW gain only explained 8 and 2% of the vari
ation in milk yield, respectively. Postcalving BW and body condition s
core were different among treatments. Posttreatment factors, such as p
ostcalving BW, accounted for more of the variation in milk yield than
did prepubertal BW gain. Prepubertal BW gains, when evaluated on a con
tinuum from 0.5 to 1.1 kg/d, explained little of the variation in milk
yield; therefore, BW gain during the prepubertal period did not signi
ficantly affect milk yield during first lactation.