EFFECTS OF 3 PREPUBERTAL BODY GROWTH-RATES ON PERFORMANCE OF HOLSTEINHEIFERS DURING FIRST LACTATION

Citation
Me. Vanamburgh et al., EFFECTS OF 3 PREPUBERTAL BODY GROWTH-RATES ON PERFORMANCE OF HOLSTEINHEIFERS DURING FIRST LACTATION, Journal of dairy science, 81(2), 1998, pp. 527-538
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience","Food Science & Tenology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00220302
Volume
81
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
527 - 538
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0302(1998)81:2<527:EO3PBG>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The effects of body weight (BW) gain, different sources of protein dur ing the prepubertal period (90 to 320 kg of BW), and the performance o f Holstein heifers during their first lactation were studied. Heifers (n = 273) were assigned to one of three dietary energy treatments that were designed to achieve average daily gains of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 kg/ d. Within each energy treatment, different protein sources (plant prot ein and urea or both plant and animal proteins) were imposed. Actual a verage daily gains by heifers on each energy treatment were 0.68, 0.83 , and 0.94 kg/d for heifers that were fed diets formulated for average daily gains of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 kg/d, respectively, which allowed th e following ages at first calving: 24.5, 22.0, and 21.3 mo. Breeding w as initiated when heifers weighed approximately 340 kg. Protein source s did not affect average daily gain or milk yield. Analysis of the pre planned comparisons of actual 305-d and 4% fat-corrected milk yields i ndicated that yield was significantly reduced for heifers grown at 0.9 4 kg/d (9387 and 8558 kg, respectively) compared with that of heifers grown at 0.68 kg/d (9873 and 9008 kg, respectively). However, further regression analysis of fat-corrected milk and residual milk from a tes t day model on prepubertal BW gain only explained 8 and 2% of the vari ation in milk yield, respectively. Postcalving BW and body condition s core were different among treatments. Posttreatment factors, such as p ostcalving BW, accounted for more of the variation in milk yield than did prepubertal BW gain. Prepubertal BW gains, when evaluated on a con tinuum from 0.5 to 1.1 kg/d, explained little of the variation in milk yield; therefore, BW gain during the prepubertal period did not signi ficantly affect milk yield during first lactation.