Am. Lardi et al., EVALUATION OF THE HEMOCUE(R) FOR MEASURING INTRAOPERATIVE HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATIONS - A COMPARISON WITH THE COULTER MAX-M(R), Anaesthesia, 53(4), 1998, pp. 349-352
We compared haemoglobin concentration values obtained using a portable
haemoglobinometer, the HemoCue, in the operating theatre with the res
ults obtained by the Coulter Max-M in the laboratory. Haemoglobin conc
entrations were measured on 52 arterial blood samples obtained from 13
patients during aortic surgery, in theatre with the HemoCue and again
by the Coulter Max-M. Twenty routine samples from the laboratory were
also analysed by both methods. There was no significant difference be
tween results, with a mean of 10.94 g.dl(-1) and 10.90 g.dl(-1) for th
e HemoCue and Coulter, respectively (p = 0.12, t = -1.99, df = 70). Th
e limits of agreement of the two methods (mean difference +/- SD) were
-0.37 and +0.45 g.dl(-1). The coefficients of repeatability of the 20
samples analysed in duplicate on each device were 0.26 g.dl(-1) and 0
.33 g.dl(-1), respectively. The coefficients of variance were 0.74% (H
emoCue) and 0.93% (Coulter). With adequate training and monitoring, th
e HemoCue provides comparable haemoglobin results for near-patient tes
ting in theatre.