F. Barbut et al., CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS - PROSPECTIVE SU RVEILLANCE IN ALL UNITS AT THE SAINT-ANTOINE HOSPITAL IN PARIS, La Presse medicale, 26(14), 1997, pp. 656-662
OBJECTIVES: All the central Venous catheters (CVC) inserted at the Sai
nt-Antoine Hospital between December 5, 1994 and June 6, 1995 were pro
spectively studied in order to better define practises in the manageme
nt of CVC and to determine the rate of catheter-related infections. ME
THODS: The following data were recorded for each CVC : insertion proce
dure, clinical data, catheter dressings, removal, catheter related inf
ections, bacteriological findings. Catheter-related infections were di
stinguished from probably catheter-related infections and localized sk
in infections. RESULTS: Among 325 patients, a total of 414 catheters w
ere inserted. At the end of the surveillance period, 350 (85 %) had be
en removed, 43 (10 %) were still in place and 21 (5 %) were lost to fo
llow-up. Analysis of procedures such as cutaneous disinfection, routin
e replacement of the iv sets or changes of dressings showed wide Varia
tions between care units and within the same unit The overall incidenc
e of catheter-related infections was 0.24 per 100 days of catheterizat
ion. Infections occurred 29 +/- 34 days after insertion. Microorganism
s responsible for catheter-related bacteremia were mostly cram positiv
e (84 %) and Gram negative (16 %). sixty-two infections(15 %) were cli
nically suspected by physicians, leading to the catheter removal in 84
% of cases. Out of the 43 CVC sent to the laboratory, 29 (67 %) were
negative (i.e. << sterile >>) in quantitative culture of the tips as d
escribed by Brun-Buisson, suggesting that the CVC was unnecessarily re
moved. Bacteriological analysis ordered by physicians were not always
relevant For example, 76 % of CVC received by the laboratory were syst
ematically sent although they were not suspected of infections. Conver
sely, only 61 % of exsudate formation at the insertion site were colle
cted and analyzed. CONCLUSION: This study was designed to recall good
guide lines to the hospital staff Results will lead to the development
of a better use of antiseptics and to the implementation of appropria
te and standardized procedures to reduce risk infection. (C) 1997, Mas
son, Paris.