C. Armbruster et B. Gmeinhart, MANAGEMENT OF HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS - TO WHAT EXTENT ARE GUIDELINES USEFUL - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE AUDIT, Acta medica austriaca, 25(1), 1998, pp. 21-26
Background: Antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis in HIV-infected p
atients follows guidelines. Aim of the study was to evaluate to what e
xtent guidelines are useful. We used a cohort of patients (I) and a na
tionwide audit (II). Subjects and methods: Over a 48-month period demo
graphic data, immunologic function and stage of HIV-infection of 433 p
atients were recorded (I). Questionnaires about the practicability of
antiretroviral therapy according to recently published guidelines were
mailed to experienced hospital departments and private offices (II).
Results: I. In 307 of 433 (70.9%) patients antiretroviral therapy and
in 107 of these 433 (24.7%) patients primary prophylaxis against PC-in
fection could be initiated according to the guidelines. In 21 of 433 p
atients (4.8%) Ganciclovir prophylaxis was applicated using Port-a-Cat
h systems in a homecare setting. II. In Austria 118 questionnaires wer
e mailed in June 1996 43 (36.4%) were returned and 38 could be evaluat
ed. 1450 patients were treated by physicians, who answered the questio
nnaires, 78.1% of these worked in hospitals and 78.9% were specialists
. 75% of the physicians had experience with HIV-infected patients exce
eding 5 years. CD4+ lymphocyte count was routinely done in 73.7% of th
e physicians, viral load only in 42.1%. These examinations were predom
inantly performed in hospitals (in 64.3% and 81.2%, respectively). Onl
y 13/36 of the physicians prescribed the recommended combination thera
py consisting of 2 nucleosides and 1 protease-inhibitor. 5/6 hospitals
and 4/8 private offices in Vienna and 6/12 hospitals outside of Vienn
a used proteaseinhibitors. Conclusions: Antiretroviral treatment accor
ding to the guidelines published recently, is only possible in centres
for the treatment of HIV-infected patients at the moment.