Gd. Mellick et al., METABOLITE MEAN TRANSIT TIMES IN THE LIVER AS PREDICTED BY VARIOUS MODELS OF HEPATIC ELIMINATION, Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 25(4), 1997, pp. 477-505
Predicted area under curve (AUC), mean transit time (MTT) and normaliz
ed variance (CV2) data have been compared for parent compound and gene
rated metabolite following an impulse input into the liver, Models stu
died were the well-stirred (tank) model, tube model, a distributed tub
e model, dispersion model (Danckwerts and mixed boundary conditions) a
nd tanks-in-series model. It is well known that discrimination between
models for a parent solute is greatest when the parent solute is high
ly extracted by the liver. With the metabolite, greatest model differe
nces for MTT and CV2 occur when parent solute is poorly extracted. In
all cases the predictions of the distributed tube, dispersion, and tas
ks-in-series models are between the predictions of the rank and tube m
odels. The dispersion model with mixed boundary conditions yields iden
tical predictions to those for the distributed tube model (assuming an
inverse gaussian distribution of tube transit times). The dispersion
model with Danckwerts boundary conditions and the tanks-in series mode
ls give similar predictions to the dispersion (mixed boundary conditio
ns) and the distributed tube. The normalized variance for parent compo
und is dependent upon hepatocyte permeability only within a distinct r
ange of permeability values. This range is similar for each model but
the order of magnitude predicted for normalized variance is model depe
ndent. Only for a one-compartment system is the MIT for generated meta
bolite equal to the sum of MTTs for the parent compound and preformed
metabolite administered as parent.