AB-INITIO TESTS OF THE MARCUS EQUATION FOR THE PREDICTION OF THE POSITION OF THE TRANSITION-STATE FOR THE REACTION H-]CH4+CH2R WITH R = H, CH3, NH2, CN, CF3, AND C6H5(C2H5R)
Wt. Lee et Ri. Masel, AB-INITIO TESTS OF THE MARCUS EQUATION FOR THE PREDICTION OF THE POSITION OF THE TRANSITION-STATE FOR THE REACTION H-]CH4+CH2R WITH R = H, CH3, NH2, CN, CF3, AND C6H5(C2H5R), The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 102(13), 1998, pp. 2332-2341
Marcus originally derived the Marcus equation to predict Bronsted coef
ficients for electron-transfer reactions. However in the literature it
is often assumed that Marcus' result can be extended to predict posit
ions of the transition state for atom-transfer reactions. In this pape
r we use ab initio methods to examine the potential energy surface and
transition state of a series of hydrogenolysis reactions of the form
H-. + CH3CH2R --> CH4 + (CH2R)-C-., with R = H, CH3, CF3, CN, NH2, and
C5H6, in order to see if the Marcus equation can be extended to atom-
transfer reactions. The calculations show that the molecular orbitals
of the system look ''reactant-like'' moving up the potential energy su
rface toward the transition state, and then switch to ''product-like''
moving down to products, in qualitative agreement with what one would
expect from the Marcus equation. However, the curve crossing from ''r
eactant-like'' to ''product-like'' molecular orbitals does not occur a
t the saddle point in the potential energy surface. Rather the curve c
rossing occurs at a point Dart way down to products. Also most of the
barrier to reaction is associated with rearrangements of the electron
clouds due to Pauli repulsions when the reactants come together and no
t with the bond destruction and bond formation professes. These rearra
ngements are not considered in the Marcus equation. We do not yet know
if our results are special to the reactions here or are general. Howe
ver, it does appear that some key physics is missing when one extends
the Marcus model to atom-or ligand-transfer reactions. One can represe
nt the key physics with a modified bond additivity potential, however.