Cn. Cornell et al., UNIPOLAR VERSUS BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (348), 1998, pp. 67-71
This paper presents the short term results of an ongoing prospective r
andomized trial comparing a cemented unipolar with a cemented bipolar
hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures
in the elderly, Forty-seven patients with an average age of 77 years
completed 6-month followup, Outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
were assessed by completion of a patient oriented hip outcome instrum
ent and by functional tests of walking speed and endurance, No differe
nces in the postoperative complication rates or lengths of hospitaliza
tion were seen between the two groups, Patients treated with a bipolar
hemiarthroplasty had greater range of hip motion in rotation and abdu
ction and had faster walking speeds, However, no differences in hip ra
ting outcomes mere found, These early results suggest that use of the
less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral
neck fracture may be justified in the elderly.