P. Eggleton et al., BODY-SIZE AND ENERGY USE IN TERMITES (ISOPTERA) - THE RESPONSES OF SOIL FEEDERS AND WOOD FEEDERS DIFFER IN A TROPICAL FOREST ASSEMBLAGE, Oikos, 81(3), 1998, pp. 525-530
Studies of log body size/log energy use in local animal assemblages re
veal a range of distributional patterns from those with a negative upp
er bound slope (NUBS), showing energy use to be dominated by smaller b
odied species, to those with a positive upper bound slope (PUBS), indi
cating that larger bodied species dominate energy use. We investigated
the log body size/log energy use relationships for a local termite as
semblage at the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve in Cameroon, and compared the
patterns for wood and soil feeding groups. We measured the biomass den
sities of 75 species of termites across three forest sites. Termite sp
ecies metabolic rates were derived either directly (25 species), or by
regression estimates (50 species), from Warburg manometry measurement
s of termite xO(2) at 28 degrees C. The combined data From the three s
ites revealed a marked difference in log body size:log energy use dist
ributions between wood and soil feeding groups. While wood feeders sho
wed a polygonal distribution, with a negative upper bound slope (NUBS)
, soil feeders showed a (statistically very significant) positive dist
ribution. The data for soil feeders are also exceptional, in compariso
n with the vast majority of other animal assemblage data, in showing s
ignificantly greater 'total' energy use for larger, compared with smal
ler, body size categories. Furthermore, the modal body size category f
or number of individual termites does not coincide with that for numbe
r of termite species. We interpret these results in the context of the
likely constraints imposed by the food substrates of termites and the
economies of scale. Specifically, soil feeders utilise a low energy,
universally abundant substrate compared with wood Feeders which feed o
n a patchily distributed, higher energy resource. Digestive efficiency
is likely to be at a premium in soil feeders, driving selection towar
ds larger body size (and hence larger gut volume and transit time), co
mpared with wood feeders.