Rl. Eckstein et al., THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RESORPTION OF LEAF RESOURCES FOR SHOOT GROWTH IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS WOODY-PLANTS FROM A SUB-ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT, Oikos, 81(3), 1998, pp. 567-575
Five evergreen and four deciduous species of woody plants were experim
entally defoliated to address the question of whether the relative imp
ortance of resource resorption from leaves to support new growth varie
s between these life-forms or whether the species show individualistic
response patterns. The deciduous and evergreen species were defoliate
d before leaf senescence in autumn and before resource mobilisation in
early summer, respectively. Responses were measured in terms of growt
h emerging the season following defoliation. Averaged across all speci
es, defoliation had general effects on growth and nutrient status of n
ew shoots. Shoot, leaf and stem weights, leaf area, leaf dry weight pe
r unit area, shoot dry weight per unit phosphorus (P) and shoot nitrog
en (N) and P pool sizes were reduced in defoliated shoots. Shoot P con
centrations in defoliated plants were increased in comparison with con
trols, leaf area per unit shoot dry weight increased, particularly in
evergreens. Leaf number, leaf N and P per unit leaf area, shoot N conc
entrations and shoot dry weight per unit N were not significantly affe
cted by the treatment but some of these parameters showed large variat
ion among species. However, there were no significant life-form specif
ic responses of the parameters measured. In contrast, marked differenc
es were found among species in their response to defoliation. The reso
rption of dry matter, N and P from old leaves to support new growth ap
pears to be equally important in deciduous and evergreen woody species
despite morphological, physiological and phenological differences bet
ween these life-forms. The magnitude of growth depression in response
to defoliation across all species was not correlated to the amount of
dry matter or nutrients removed, to the species' resorption efficiency
or to the potential benefit of resorption in terms of future growth.
Rather the species responded to defoliation in an individualistic way.