G. Marland et B. Schlamadinger, FORESTS FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION OR FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSTITUTION - A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, Biomass & bioenergy, 13(6), 1997, pp. 389-397
Among the proposals for mitigating the increase of atmospheric CO, are
the possibility of reforesting degraded lands to sequester C or of us
ing sustainable forest harvests to displace fossil fuels. Storing C on
-site in forests and harvesting forests for a sustainable flow of fore
st products are not necessarily conflicting options if we recognize th
at their relative merits in mitigating net emissions of C will depend
on site-specific factors, such as forest productivity and the efficien
cy with which harvested material is used. Since the land available for
reforestation or development of forest plantations is limited, the re
lative merits of the different mitigation strategies need to be consid
ered. We use a mathematical model of C stocks and flows to compare the
net effect on C emissions to the atmosphere for the two approaches ov
er a range of values of forest productivity and the efficiency of prod
uct use. When sustainably-produced forest products are used inefficien
tly to displace fossil fuels, the greater C benefit is achieved throug
h reforestation and protection of standing forests, and increasing the
rate of stand growth yields little gain. However, when forest product
s are used efficiently to displace fossil fuels, sustainable harvest p
roduces the greater net C benefits, and the benefit increases rapidly
with increasing productivity. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.