Ep. Steinberg et al., PROFILING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY - OUTCOMES AND QUALITY OF INFERTILITY MANAGEMENT, Fertility and sterility, 69(4), 1998, pp. 617-623
Objective: To critically appraise the content of the American Society
for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Reproductive Technology (
SART) Registry. Design: English-language literature review. Patient(s)
: Women undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology (AR
T). Intervention(s): Current ART treatments, including NF, GIFT, zygot
e intrafollopian transfer (ZIFT), oocyte micromanipulation, and cryopr
eserved embryo transfers. Main Outcome Measure(s): Compliance with cli
nical practice guidelines, and casemix-adjusted rates of live delivery
, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, birth defects, i
mplantation, fertilization, and retrieval. Result(s): Outcomes should
be adjusted for variation in patient characteristics known to affect p
rognosis, including maternal age, the duration of infertility, the pre
sumed cause(s) of infertility, the patient's prior history of treatmen
t for infertility, and diethylstilbestrol exposure. Outcome rates shou
ld be reported using the patient as the denominator, as well as cycle,
retrieval, and transfer. The statistical significance of observed dif
ferences in events rates should be indicated. Because widely accepted
clinical practice guidelines related to performance of ART procedures
are not available, compliance with practice guidelines cannot currentl
y be assessed. Conclusion(s): Reports based on ASRM/SART Registry data
can be enhanced by refined casemix adjustment, assessing outcome rate
s per patient, as well as per component of ART procedure, and by provi
ding an indication of the statistical significance of observed differe
nces in event rates. In addition, a critical appraisal of available ev
idence related to particular aspects of infertility management would h
elp clarify the areas in which there is an evidentiary basis for formu
lation of practice guidelines, as well as topics requiring additional
clinical research. (C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medic
ine.