P. Prakash et al., PREPARATION BY DIFFERENTIAL GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION IS BETTER THAN SWIM-UP IN SELECTING SPERM WITH NORMAL MORPHOLOGY (STRICT CRITERIA), Fertility and sterility, 69(4), 1998, pp. 722-726
Objective: To evaluate two commonly used methods of sperm preparation
with respect to their effects on sperm morphology (strict criteria). D
esign: Auto-controlled. split sample study performed on the semen of 7
4 male partners of couples enrolled for IVF. Setting: In vitro fertili
zation and andrology laboratories at a tertiary care, major teaching h
ospital. Patient(s): Seventy-four male partners of couples who were sc
heduled to undergo IVF. Intervention(s): Equal halves of the same seme
n sample were evaluated for strict criteria sperm morphology before an
d after preparation by differential gradient centrifugation using Perc
oll (Pacific Andrology, Montrose, CA) and by the standard swim-up meth
od. Main Outcome Measure(s): The percentage of morphologically normal
sperm was assessed using strict criteria before and after the two meth
ods of sperm preparation. Specific parameters studied were individual
abnormalities of the head, midpiece, and tail. Result(s): Sperm prepar
ation using differential gradient centrifugation with Percoll produced
a significantly greater number of specimens with normal sperm morphol
ogy and also showed higher absolute quantitative improvement over the
swim-up method. The two methods were comparable in regard to their eff
ects on specific sperm abnormalities !i.e., head, midpiece, and tail d
efects). Conclusion(s): The differential gradient sperm separation met
hod using Percoll is superior to the swim-up method for selecting sper
m with normal morphology as assessed by strict criteria. Because sperm
morphology as assessed by strict criteria is a good predictor of oocy
te fertilization, this method can be recommended as the method of choi
ce for assisted reproductive technology laboratories. Use of this meth
od may help improve outcome by increasing fertilization rates. (C) 199
8 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).