We present the completed 1-year follow-up results of the original Sten
t Restenosis Study (STRESS I), in which 407 patients with symptomatic
ischemic heart disease and new lesions of the native coronary circulat
ion were randomly assigned to treatment with either the Palmaz-Schatz
coronary stent or conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angi
oplasty (PTCA). The present study compares the safety of elective sten
ting to balloon angioplasty (PTCA) in terms of freedom from clinical e
vents up to 1 year after treatment. Patients were enrolled and treated
from January 1991 through February 1993, and follow-up data were coll
ected and verified until July 1995, Ninety-seven percent of all patien
ts had complete follow-up (deceased or alive with known clinical statu
s) beyond 8 months, and 94% beyond 11 months, Anginal status between 9
to 15 months post-procedure was available for 78% of patients, At 1 y
ear, 154 patients (75%) assigned to stent implantation and 141 (70%) t
o PTCA were free of all clinical events (death, myocardial infarction,
or any revascularization procedure), and 162 stent patients (79%) and
149 PTCA patients (74%) were free from death, myocardial infarction,
or target lesion revascularization, Symptom-driven target lesion revas
cularization occurred in 12% of the stent group versus 17% of the PTCA
group, None of these differences in clinical events was statistically
significant, Only 2 patients in the stent group and 7 in the PTCA gro
up had a first event after 239 days, and freedom from angina at 1 year
was reported in equal frequency in both groups (84%). There appear to
be no late adverse effects of stent implantation. However, these resu
lts are limited by low statistical power, narrow patient selection, an
d the anticoagulation regimen used in the early experience with this d
evice. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.