The writing of speeches for the President is inevitably connected to p
ublic policy. Speeches provide opportunities to articulate policy, and
their preparation often forces the setting of agendas and the determi
nation or clarification of policy positions. This makes the growing di
sjunction between presidential speeches and the clear accurate express
ion of administration goals and policy initiatives noted by observers
of the contemporary presidency all the more arresting. We locate the b
eginning of this trend in the Johnson White House and compare the orga
nizational responses of Presidents Johnson and Nixon to the challenge
of creating a viable writing operation linked to policy making. Of the
two, Nixon was more effective, particularly during his first term, an
d his experience suggests lessons that his successors have largely fai
led to follow.