Re. Gliklich et al., COMBINING FREE-FLAP RECONSTRUCTION AND CRANIOFACIAL PROSTHETIC TECHNIQUE FOR ORBIT, SCALP, AND TEMPORAL DEFECTS, The Laryngoscope, 108(4), 1998, pp. 482-487
Objectives: To identify factors leading to successful application of p
rosthetic techniques following free flap reconstruction of the orbit,
scalp, and temporal region. Study Design: Retrospective review. Method
s: Twenty-eight patients who underwent free flap reconstruction for de
fects of these regions between 1989 and 1996 were reviewed for clinica
l parameters, flap loss, patient survival, and implant loss rate. Pros
thetic usage rates were compared before and after introduction of a si
te-specific reconstructive algorithm, Results: Free Bap success rate w
as 93%, whereas osseointegrated implant loss rate mas 11%, In addition
to implants, a reconstructive strategy that provided thin, vascular t
issue between bone and shin, a flat platform in the temporal region, a
nd preservation of orbital cavity depth led to increased prosthetic us
age. Conclusions: Craniofacial prosthetic techniques can significantly
augment the results of free flap surgery for the orbit, scalp, and te
mporary region, Successful combination of these techniques requires a
site-specific surgical approach.