Bw. Ritchie et al., SAFETY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF AN INACTIVATED AVIAN POLYOMAVIRUS VACCINE, American journal of veterinary research, 59(2), 1998, pp. 143-148
Objective-To determine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of an inac
tivated avian polyomavirus vaccine in nonbudgerigar psittacine birds t
hat varied in age, species, and immunologic status. Animals-Safety of
the vaccine was evaluated in 1,823 psittacines representing more than
80 species. Immunogenicity was evaluated in 285 birds (260 of various
Psittaciformes species, 25 chickens). Efficacy was evaluated in 104 bi
rds (78 of various Psittaciformes species, 26 chickens). Procedures-Sa
fety was evaluated by vaccinating birds that were determined to be ser
onegative or seropositive (titer > 1:10) prior to vaccination. Birds w
ere then evaluated for clinically detectable systemic or local reactio
ns for 2 months to 2 years. immunogenicity was evaluated by testing fo
r virus-neutralizing antibodies, vaccinating each bird twice, and then
testing for a significant change in antibody titer. Efficacy was eval
uated by vaccinating birds, followed in 2 to 4 weeks by intramuscular
or intravenous challenge exposure. After challenge exposure, protectio
n was evaluated by attempting to recover virus from tissues or by obse
rving birds for clinical signs of disease and testing for a significan
t change in titer. Conclusions-Avian polyomavirus vaccine is safe, imm
unogenic, and efficacious for use in multiple species of mature and im
mature psittacines. Clinical Relevance-Until now, prevention of polyom
avirus infection in psittacine birds could only be accomplished throug
h strict isolation to reduce potential exposure to the virus. The USDA
-registered inactivated avian polyomavirus vaccine can safely be used
to protect vaccinates from infection and control spread of this virus
in flocks.