Dm. Caretti et Ja. Whitley, EXERCISE PERFORMANCE DURING INSPIRATORY RESISTANCE BREATHING UNDER EXHAUSTIVE CONSTANT-LOAD WORK, Ergonomics, 41(4), 1998, pp. 501-511
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different in
spiratory resistances on exercise performance and to describe physiolo
gical and subjective responses during constant load work of an intensi
ty that elicits the maximum sensitivity to respiratory factors of resp
irator wear. Nine subjects (mean age 25.8 +/- 4.8 years) performed exh
austive treadmill exercise during constant load work of 80% of maximal
aerobic capacity while inspiring against one of five randomly assigne
d inspiratory resistance conditions. For inspiratory resistances of 0.
20 kPa (R1), 0.29 kPa (R2), 0.39 kPa (R3), and 0.49 kPa (R4): measured
at a steady air flow rate of 85 L min(-1), average performance times
were 84, 75, 54, and 30% of the control condition. Performance time re
ductions were significant for R3 and R4 trials. Results also indicated
a significantly reduced mean respiration rate, minute ventilation, an
d oxygen ventilatory equivalent (V-E/VO2) for the R4 condition at exer
cise breakpoint compared to control. For resistances R1 - R4, mean V-E
/VO2 were significantly reduced from control by approximately 12, 17,
19, and 31%. At breakpoint, mean ratings of perceived exertion were si
milar for control, R1, R2, and R3 conditions but were significantly lo
wer for R4 versus control. Breathing comfort did not differ significan
tly between resistances below the R3 level, but discomfort was signifi
cantly greater for conditions R3 and R4. These findings suggest that t
he impact of the respiratory limitations of respirators can be diminis
hed by employing respirators with inspiratory resistances below the R3
level.