G. Elmore et al., 10-YEAR RISK OF FALSE-POSITIVE SCREENING MAMMOGRAMS AND CLINICAL BREAST EXAMINATIONS, The New England journal of medicine, 338(16), 1998, pp. 1089-1096
Background The cumulative risk of a false positive result of a breast-
cancer screening test is unknown. Methods We performed a 10-year retro
spective cohort study of breast-cancer screening and diagnostic evalua
tions among 2400 women who were 40 to 69 years old at study entry. Mam
mograms or clinical breast examinations that were interpreted as indet
erminate, aroused a suspicion of cancer, or prompted recommendations f
or additional workup in women in whom breast cancer was not diagnosed
within the next year were considered to be false positive tests. Resul
ts A total of 9762 screening mammograms and 10,905 screening clinical
breast examinations were performed, for a median of 4 mammograms and 5
clinical breast examinations per woman over the 10-year period. Of th
e women who were screened, 23.8 percent had at least one false positiv
e mammogram, 13.4 percent had at least one false positive breast exami
nation, and 31.7 percent had at least one false positive result for ei
ther test. The estimated cumulative risk of a false positive result wa
s 49.1 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 40.3 to 64.1 percent)
after 10 mammograms and 22.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval,
19.2 to 27.5 percent) after 10 clinical breast examinations. The false
positive tests led to 870 outpatient appointments, 539 diagnostic mam
mograms, 186 ultrasound examinations, 188 biopsies, and 1 hospitalizat
ion. We estimate that among women who do not have breast cancer, 18.6
percent (95 percent confidence interval, 9.8 to 41.2 percent) will und
ergo a biopsy after 10 mammograms, and 6.2 percent (95 percent confide
nce interval, 3.7 to 11.2 percent) after 10 clinical breast examinatio
ns. For every $100 spent for screening, an additional $33 was spent to
evaluate the false positive results. Conclusions Over 10 years, one t
hird of the women screened had abnormal test results requiring additio
nal evaluation, even though no breast cancer was present. Techniques a
re needed to decrease false positive results while maintaining high se
nsitivity. Physicians should educate women about the risk of a false p
ositive result of a screening test for breast cancer. (C) 1998, Massac
husetts Medical Society.