P. Lahteenmaki et al., OPEN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF USE OF LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINESYSTEM AS ALTERNATIVE TO HYSTERECTOMY, BMJ. British medical journal, 316(7138), 1998, pp. 1122-1126
Objectives: To assess whether the levonorgestrel intrauterine system c
ould provide a conservative alternative to hysterectomy in the treatme
nt of excessive uterine bleeding. Design: Open randomised multicentre
study with two parallel groups: a levonorgestrel intrauterine system g
roup and a control group. Setting Gynaecology departments of three hos
pitals in Finland, Subjects: Fifty six women aged 33-49 years schedule
d to undergo hysterectomy for treatment of excessive uterine bleeding.
Interventions: Women were randomised either to continue with their cu
rrent medical treatment or to have a levonorgestrel intrauterine syste
m inserted. Main outcome measure: Proportion of women cancelling their
decision to undergo hysterectomy. Results: At 6 months, 64.3% (95% co
nfidence interval 44.1 to 81.4%) of the women in the levonorgestrel in
trauterine system group and 14.3% (4.0 to 32.7%) in the control group
had cancelled their decision to undergo hysterectomy (P < 0.001). Conc
lusions: The use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system is a good c
onservative alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagi
a and should be considered before hysterectomy or other invasive treat
ments.