COMPARISON OF EFFECTS OF TAMOXIFEN AND TOREMIFENE ON BONE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS

Citation
Mb. Marttunen et al., COMPARISON OF EFFECTS OF TAMOXIFEN AND TOREMIFENE ON BONE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 83(4), 1998, pp. 1158-1162
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0021972X
Volume
83
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1158 - 1162
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(1998)83:4<1158:COEOTA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Antiestrogens are used in the treatment, and sometimes even in the pro phylaxis, of breast cancer. Tamoxifen is the most commonly used anties trogen, but toremifene is gaining in popularity. We compared here the effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on bone metabolism and density in 30 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer, who were randomized to receive tamoxifen [20 mg/day, n = 16) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 14 ) for 1 yr. Biochemical markers of bone resorption [urinary hydroxypro line, serum cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collage n, urinary cross-linked aminoterminal telopeptide of type I collagen ( NTx)] and bone formation [serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, os teocalcin, and aminoterminal and carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen] were assessed before treatment and at 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spi ne and proximal femur (neck, trochanter? and Ward's triangle) was meas ured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before treatment and at 12 months of treatment. Urinary NTx decreased after 6 months' use of tam oxifen (mean fall: 33%) and of toremifene (mean fall: 16%). Use of tam oxifen was associated with a significant decrease in osteocalcin (mean fall: 25%) and aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (mean f all: 22%), whereas toremifene failed to influence these markers. Tamox ifen increased BMD, on average, by 2% in the lumbar spine, 1% in the f emoral neck, and 5% in Ward's triangle. Toremifene failed to increase BMD at any site measured, and in contrast, a slight trend toward a fal l (-0.3 to -0.9%) in BMD was seen in patients treated with toremifene. Falls in urinary NTx, from baseline to 6 months, correlated significa ntly with changes in the lumbar spine BMD (r = -0.57, P = 0.0002) in t he whole patient series. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) increa ses EMD in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, whereas toremifene ( 40 mg/day) merely prevents the increasing age-associated fall in BMD. More prolonged studies on bone metabolism, comparing these two antiest rogens, are needed; but even now, clinicians should be aware of these differences between tamoxifen and toremifene.