Gpb. Kraan et al., THE DAILY CORTISOL PRODUCTION REINVESTIGATED IN HEALTHY-MEN - THE SERUM AND URINARY CORTISOL PRODUCTION-RATES ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 83(4), 1998, pp. 1247-1252
We have measured the urinary cortisol production rate (uCPR) simultane
ously with the serum cortisol production rate (sCPR) in four healthy m
en within a period of 3 days. uCPR, determined by isotope dilution of
11-oxoetiocholanolone was compared with sCPR, which was measured in th
ree different ways (a, b, c). Blood was sampled at 10-min intervals fo
r 24 h, and deconvolution analysis was applied to the cortisol concent
rations. The daily serum cortisol production per liter, multiplied by
the distribution volume yielded sCPR. The measurement methods are char
acterized as follows: a) the secretion and elimination terms were free
; b) like method a, but with the input of the rate constants alpha and
beta into the elimination function; c) the average 24-h cortisol conc
entration was multiplied by the metabolic clearance rate. uCPR was 25.
4 +/- 4.7 [range: 21.3-31.4] mu mol/(m(2).day), sCPR (method a) was 28
.8 +/- 4.5 [range: 23.5-34.3] mu mol/(m(2).day), sCPR (method b) was 2
7.9 +/- 8.1 [range: 18.5-37.7] mu mol/(m(2).day), and sCPR (method c)
was 29.3 +/- 4.8 [range: 22.7-33.2] mu mol/(m(2).day). uCPR did not si
gnificantly differ from each of the 3 sCPR values (P > 0.30; >0.46; an
d >0.06, respectively). The patterns of the cortisol secretory rates i
n the present and previous studies do not necessarily represent the ph
ysiological process of the secretory bursts. We conclude that the esti
mated CPR, being 25-30 mu mol/(m(2).day) [9-11 mg/(m(2).day)], can ser
ve as a guideline for glucocorticoid replacement dose and that the uri
nary route to measure CPR is preferred because of its relative ease.