Gl. Bowlin et al., IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF ELECTROSTATIC ENDOTHELIAL-CELL TRANSPLANTATIONONTO 4 MM INTERIOR DIAMETER EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE GRAFTS, Journal of vascular surgery, 27(3), 1998, pp. 504-511
Purpose: To perform an in vitro evaluation of electrostatic endothelia
l cell transplantation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVE
C) onto segments of 4 mm internal diameter expanded polytetrafluoroeth
ylene (ePTFE) vascular prostheses. Methods: This evaluation consisted
of exposing vascular graft segments that had been subjected to either
electrostatic or gravitation transplantation with HUVEC to a physiolog
ic shear stress (15 dynes/cm(2)) under steady now conditions within a
flow loop system. Biochemical assays were performed on freshly transpl
anted grafts by means of radioimmunoassay for prostacyclin and thrombo
xane A(2). Results: There was a 30% loss of HUVEC after 30 minutes of
shear stress exposure from the grafts subjected to gravitational trans
plantation with no additional significant (alpha = 0.05) loss after 12
0 minutes. Grafts subjected to electrostatic transplantation had no si
gnificant (alpha = 0.05) loss of HUVEC during exposure to physiologic
shear stress. Furthermore, after 120 minutes of shear-stress exposure,
the grafts subjected to electrostatic transplantation (78,420 +/- 627
4 HUVEC/cm(2)) retained 2.3 times more HUVEC than the counterparts sub
jected to gravitational transplantation (34,427 +/- 4637 HUVEC/cm(2)).
The biochemical assay results indicated no significant (alpha = 0.05)
production of prostacyclin or thromboxane A(2) regardless of the meth
od of cell transplantation. Conclusions: (1) The electrostatic transpl
antation technique was superior to the gravitational transplantation t
echnique in terms of cellular retention when the ePTFE grafts were exp
osed to physiologic shear stress. (2) Production of prostacyclin and t
hromboxane A(2) did not differ between transplanted HUVEC subjected to
gravitational or electrostatic procedures.