A DISCRETE-CHOICE MODEL OF DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT LOCATION

Citation
Ac. Goodman et al., A DISCRETE-CHOICE MODEL OF DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT LOCATION, Health services research, 33(1), 1998, pp. 125-145
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Heath Policy & Services","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
ISSN journal
00179124
Volume
33
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
125 - 145
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-9124(1998)33:1<125:ADMODT>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective. To identify short-term drug abuse treatment location risk f actors for ten large, self-insured firms starting January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1991. Data Sources/Study Setting. Study population selected from a large database of health insurance claims for all tre atment events starting January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1991. S tudy Design. A nested binomial legit method is used to estimate firm-s pecific patterns of treatment location. The differences in treatment l ocation patterns among firms are then decomposed into firm effects (ho lding explanatory variables constant among firms) and variable effects (holding firm-specific parameters constant). Principal Findings. Prob ability of inpatient drug treatment is directly related to the type of drug diagnosis. The most important factors are diagnoses of drug depe ndence (versus drug abuse) and/or a cocaine dependence. Firm-specific factors also make a substantive difference. Controlling for patient ri sk factors, firm-specific probabilities of inpatient treatment vary by as much as 87 percent. Controlling for practices of firms and their i nsurance carriers, differing patient risk profiles cause probabilities of inpatient treatment to vary by as much as 69 percent among firms. Use of the outpatient setting increased over the three-year period. Co nclusions. There are two plausible explanations for the findings. Firs t, people beginning treatment later in the three-year period had less severe conditions than earlier cases and therefore had less need of in patient treatment. Second, drug abuse treatment experienced the same t rend toward the increased use of outpatient care that characterized tr eatment for other illnesses in the 1980s and early 1990s.