A COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF EXPERTS AND NON-EXPERTS TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN ADULT AND CHILD HUMAN BITE MARKS USING RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) ANALYSIS
Dk. Whittaker et al., A COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF EXPERTS AND NON-EXPERTS TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN ADULT AND CHILD HUMAN BITE MARKS USING RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) ANALYSIS, Forensic science international, 92(1), 1998, pp. 11-20
Fifty colour prints of human bite marks were sent to 109 observers who
were asked to decide using a six point rating scale, whether the mark
s had been produced by the teeth of an adult or a child. The observers
consisted of accredited senior forensic dentists, accredited junior f
orensic dentists, general dental practitioners, final year dental stud
ents, police officers and social workers. The results were compared ag
ainst a ''gold standard'' which was the actual verdict from the case.
Comparison of the results between the groups of observers and the stan
dard was made using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) methodolo
gy. The best decisions were made by senior/junior experts or final yea
r dental students. General dental practitioners and police officers we
re least able to differentiate correctly between adult and child bite
marks. The effect of training is important and its effects need to be
assessed in more derail in future studies. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science I
reland Ltd.