S. Thorin et al., STUDY OF SIPHON ACTIVITY IN MYA ARENARIA (L.) IN THE INTERTIDAL ZONE BY MEANS OF AN UNDERWATER VIDEO CAMERA, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 224(2), 1998, pp. 205-224
The siphon activity of Mya arenaria (L.) was filmed at two sites in he
intertidal zone characterised by different current speeds. In each ex
periment, the behaviour of individuals was studied for two tidal cycle
s. Individual behaviour was compared in relation to the sites and to t
he orientation of the clams relative to the current. The ability of in
dividual clams buried at various depths to extend their siphons above
the sediment surface was also tested. The clams kept their siphons ope
n without any apparent movement 84.5% of the total submersion time. Th
e most frequent movement was simultaneous closing followed, with an ap
proximate delay of 10 s, by the simultaneous opening of the two siphon
s. These movements are part of a main behavioural sequence that accoun
ted for 87.8% of the observed sequences between the 'two siphons open'
state. The production of pseudofaeces was the only behaviour correlat
ed with stomach content. The clams did not extend their siphons above
the sediments. There was no effect of clam orientation on either their
behaviour or stomach content. The two groups of individuals observed
at the weak current site seemed to have a similar feeding activity, un
like the two other groups located where the current velocity was stron
ger. The first of these latter groups had a weaker phaeopigment conten
t in their stomachs, while the second group had a high frequency of si
multaneous closings of the two siphons and a similar stomach content c
ompared with the individuals at the weaker current site. However, we c
annot state that siphon closure enhances the feeding success of indivi
duals or is linked with the flow regime because variations in the beha
viour between experiment dates suggest that there is another factor th
at may intervene. These inter-date variations could probably be explai
ned by differences in the seston availability between tidal cycles. (C
) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.